What are the main differences between authoritarian and democratic regimes?

Democratic and dictator atomic number 18 demon very distinguishable and contradicting forms of politicsal regimes. They differ in the way a country or a state is managed. In stressing to position and discuss the differences surrounded by the two regimes, we should think what implications do the two regimes have on the political system. How be they different in terms of the institutions they intact? How argon rulers elected and which atomic number 53 provides the more comprehensive office? How does the law making physical process differ, what implications do they have on the judiciary and civil rights? Is the dissemination of power different in the two regimes? And finally which one is more prosperous economically and in providing a stable political system. I outset off by nerve-wracking to define the general characteristics of the two regimes. Authoritarian regime is a political rule forced upon its citizens without their consent. In other words, at that place is no conception of free and honorable elections and rulers rule in their own interest over the mass. Rulers do not case the threat of exit or questioning and thus are not accountable to anyone. Organisations that are critical of the regime and attempt to discuss authorization alternatives are either banned or severely punished. emancipation of speech and the existence of unbiased media are inconceivable. Inflow of culture is either manipulated or not allowed as it may bristle a possible threat to the regime. nigh examples of states with these characteristics are Iraq, conjugation Korea, Egypt, and UAE. Singe troupe states, dictatorships and military regimes are types of authoritarian rule. The head start two of these are similar to each other. one company states allow only one political party to make out in elections and rule over the state and dictatorships deck up when the leader of the single party accumulates power and forces it...

--References --> Democratic - non a form of government authoritarian - Not a form of government Well, it appears they are \systems of ruling\ and not \forms of government.\ What is a form of government: 1.) federal official country 2.) Republic 3.) Monarchy 4.) complete Monarchy 5.) Communist 7.) Dictatorship ect, ect, ect Lets us bearing closer: Executive branches of government: 1.) A President 2.) A Prime Minister 3.) A King or tycoon 4.) An Emporer or Empress 5. ) A sheik or Shah 6.) For 3,4, and five exactly a \Monarch.\ Please, realistically, do tell [FACTUAL WISE] how a comparative fundamental Monarchy, where the MONARCH has executive authority, is not as good a FEDERAL REPUBLIC LIKE THAT OF THE UNITED STATES? \Election\ is but an ignorant cop-out. *waits for answer* If you want to get a safe essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay